Biography in English

Chang Shih-chao ( 1 88 1-), journalist, educator, government official, and lawyer, established his claim to prominence in the fields of Chinese letters and political thought primarily as the editor of such journals as the Su-pao, the Tu-li chou-pao [independent weekly], and especially the Chia-yin [tiger] group of publications. A native of Changsha, Hunan, Chang Shihchao was born into a farming family. Although they were poor, his parents were able to send him to a local private school, where he acquired a solid foundation in classical Chinese learning. In 1901 he and his younger brother went to Wuchang in search of a military education, and in the following year Chang was admitted to the Military Academy at Nanking, where one of his fellow students was the future anti-Manchu revolutionary leader, Chao Sheng {see Huang Hsing). Soon, however, Chang left Nanking during a wave of student unrest and, with some 30 schoolmates, went to Shanghai. There he enrolled in the Ai-kuo hsueh-she [patriotic institute], a school where students were taught revolutionary ideas by such faculty members as Ts'ai Yuan-p'ei (the principal), Chang Ping-lin, and Wu Chih-hui (qq.v.). Here, Chang came into contact with Chang Chi, Tsou Jung (18851905 ; ECCP, II, 769), and other young radicals. In May 1903, Chang Shih-chao was engaged as editor in chief of the noted newspaper Su-pao. In this paper, in addition to expressing his own increasingly radical views, he published two inflamatory pieces by Chang Ping-lin — his preface to Tsou Jung's celebrated pamphlet, Ko-ming-chün [revolutionary army], and his famous refutation of K'ang Yu-wei's views supporting constitutional monarchy. In response to the increasingly revolutionary tone taken by the Su-pao under Chang's editorship, the Manchu authorities had the paper banned in July and had Chang Ping-lin and Tsou Jung imprisoned. Although he was the editor of the offending paper, Chang Shih-chao was not arrested.

In August 1903, Chang Shih-chao joined Chang Chi, Ch'en Tu-hsiu, and others in Shanghai in organizing the Kuo-min jih-jih pao [national daily news], a daily newspaper, which in its advocacy of political revolution was even more radical than the Su-pao. Chang Shih-chao's articles in this newspaper, signed with his pen name Ch'ing-t'ung, soon became famous among students in China and Japan not only as political documents but also as models of literary style.

In the winter of 1903 Chang was associated with Huang Hsing (q.v.) in the founding of the Hua-hsing-hui, a secret society designed to prepare for a large-scale anti-Manchu revolution in Hunan. Chang Shih-chao was also responsible for a Chinese translation of a book written by Miyazaki Torazo, a Japanese adventurer who was an active supporter of Sun Yat-sen's political cause. Entitled Sanju-sannen no yume [the thirtythree years' dream], that book had first appeared in Japan in 1902. Chang's abridged Chinese version, which contained a preface lauding Sun Yat-sen as the leading contemporary revolutionist of China, was published at Shanghai in 1903 and was widely read. Late in 1904, Chang Shih-chao was jailed with Chang Chi and Huang Hsing on suspicion of being involved in a plot to assassinate Wang Chih-ch'un, a former governor of Kwangsi. Some six weeks later they were released, but fearing further action by the government authorities, Chang and his companions left for Japan.

In Tokyo, Chang Shih-chao was greatly impressed by Japanese modernization and came to the conclusion that, for China to achieve similar modernization, the basic requirement would be the development of education, not political revolution. Thus, he gradually abandoned his radical views, and when the revolutionary T'ung-meng-hui was organized in August 1905, he refused to join in spite of repeated appeals from his former colleagues, Chang Chi and Chang Ping-lin. Enrolling at the Seisoku School to study English, he began to prepare himself for the study of European civilization and departed in 1908 for Scotland to continue his Western education. At the University of Edinburgh he majored in political economy and became an avid reader of works on constitutional government and the cabinet system by such authors as Walter Bagehot, James Bryce, and Leonard Trelawney Hobhouse. He also developed a fondness for logic and pored over the works of ancient Chinese ming-chia [logicians]. These studies enabled him to make certain corrections in the translations of Mill and Jevons which had been made by Yen Fu (q.v.).

After the Wuchang revolt of October 1911, Chang returned to China. While in Great Britain, he had written several articles on the development of constitutional government and political parties in the West. Appearing in the Ti-kuo jih-pao [imperial daily news] in Peking, these articles had attracted the attention of several Chinese advocates of constitutional government. After his return to Shanghai, Chang discussed at length with Sung Chiao-jen (q.v.) the problems of government organization. Although he continued to resist pressures from his old associates to join the T'ung-meng-hui, he accepted the invitation of Yu Yu-jen (q.v.) to join the editorial staff of the Min-li-pao [people's strength]. In the spring and summer of 1912 Chang outlined his views on party politics in the Min-li-pao. An admirer of the British two-party system, he deplored the bewildering array of political parties then being organized in China. He proposed that all existing parties be dissolved and that at a national political consultative conference two large parties be created to represent opposing political views. These proposals were attacked from several quarters, and particularly by members of the T'ung-meng-hui (which had been reorganized as the Kuomintang). Under fire from the Kuomintang, he left the Min-li-pao and in September 1912 founded his own paper, the Tu-li chou-pao [independent weekly] . Thus, he continued to express his theories on government and his opinions on current affairs. In the latter part of 1912, as tension mounted between the Kuomintang and president Yuan Shih-k'ai, the latter, to exploit Chang's differences with the revolutionary party, invited him to Peking and offered him several high positions, including the chancellorship of Peking University. Chang was suspicious of Yuan's intentions, however, and following the assassination of Sung Chiao-jen in March 1913, he left Peking for Shanghai. There he met one of Yuan's former rivals, Ts'en Ch'un-hsuan (q.v.), and began to work with him in organizing opposition to Yuan. "During the so-called second revolution in the summer of 1913, Chang Shih-chao served as secretary general to his old friend Huang Hsing. After the collapse of that effort, Chang joined the general exodus of Yuan's political enemies to Japan, where he remained for the next three years.

In May 1914 Chang Shih-chao founded the most famous of all his publications, the Chia-yin tsa-chih (The Tiger Magazine). The magazine criticized Yuan Shih-k'ai for violating the principles of republican government. It soon became an important forum of opinion both in China and abroad, and one of its most notable features, the correspondence column, carried letters from such figures as Ch'en Tu-hsiu, Li Ta-chao, and Wu Chih-hui. But the most important contributor was Chang Shih-chao himself, who in his articles expounded his ideas on constitutional government, the cabinet system, and the doctrine of political compromise. The moderate tone and logical clarity of these essays soon gained for the Chia-yin tsa-chih great popularity and influence among Chinese intellectuals. Early in 1916, as armed resistance to Yuan Shih-k'ai's monarchical movement increased, Chang Shih-chao followed Ts'en Ch'un-hsuan back to China. In May, when Ts'en became acting head of the anti-Yuan military council at Chaoch'ing, Kwangtung, Chang became secretary general of the organization. After Li Yuan-hung had been installed as the new president, Chang went to Peking to sit in the reconvened National Assembly (he had been elected from Hunan as Senator in 1913). He also served as senior instructor in logic at the newly opened research institute of Peking University. In January 1917 he revived his magazine as a daily newspaper, Chia-yin Jih-k'an (The Tiger Daily). After the seizure of power by Tuan Ch'i-jui and the dissolution of the National Assembly in June, Chang left Peking for Shanghai. In May 1918, the military government in Canton, established in the preceding year by Sun Yat-sen, was reorganized under the control of Chang's former associate Ts'en Ch'unhsuan. Through Ts'en, Chang was appointed one of the Canton delegates when peace talks between the northern and southern governments were held in Shanghai in 1919.

By that time the chaotic political conditions within the country and the repeated failures of the National Assembly to assert its authority over the military had caused Chang Shih-chao and many other leading intellectuals to doubt the suitability of representative government to China. In February 1921, Chang left again for Europe with the intention of examining at first hand the political changes that had taken place in England. In London, he had talks with such celebrities as H. G. Wells and George Bernard Shaw. Their comments upon the political situation in China served to reinforce his doubts about the efficacy of the representative parliamentary system. He came to believe that it was suitable only to the industrialized nations of the West and that since China was fundamentally an agricultural nation, its basic need was the development of political and social institutions suitable to an agricultural economy. Chang returned to China in 1922 and in November accepted the invitation of the ministry of education to serve as chancellor of Peking Agricultural Institute, then being reorganized as the National College of Agriculture. However, following the ouster of President Li Yuanhung by the Chihli militarists in June 1923, Chang left Peking for Shanghai. In October, the election of Ts'ao K'un to the presidency through the bribing of members of the national assembly completed Chang's disenchantment with the parliamentary system of government. In a number of articles published in the Sin-wenpao [the news] and the Tung-fang tsa-chih [eastern miscellany] , he urged the rejection ofthe representative system and other political institutions borrowed from the West and the adoption of a political system more in keeping with China's agricultural foundations. To give greater publicity to his views on the development of agriculture in China, Chang planned to resume publication of "The Tiger" as a weekly magazine.

In October 1924, Ts'ao K'un was ousted from the presidency, and Tuan Ch'i-jui was installed as provisional chief executive. Because of Chang's recent proposals to abolish the National Assembly and the constitution, Tuan believed that he could exploit Chang's reputation by including him in his government. In November Chang accepted the post of minister ofjustice in Tuan's government and shortly afterward began the prosecution of those assembly members who had been involved in the bribed election of Ts'ao K'un.

In April 1925, increasing friction between the government and the college community in Peking led to Chang's appointment as acting minister of education. Dissatisfied with academic standards and discipline, he announced that henceforth the ministry of education would conduct all matriculation and graduation examinations, and that the eight universities in Peking would be merged under one administration. These measures provoked bitter opposition from the students, who until then had not been required to take examinations. Resentment of Chang Shih-chao came to a head on 7 May 1926, observed by students as "national humiliation day" (on 7 May 1915, Japan had presented the famous Twenty-one Demands upon China). Enraged by press reports that the ministry of education had banned all demonstrations on that day, bands of students marched on Chang's residence, caused considerable damage, and, two days later, appealed for his dismissal. On 12 May, Chang resigned as minister ofeducation and left for Shanghai.

In June, however, Chang returned to Peking, at Tuan's request, to resume his duties as minister of justice. Confronted with continuing student unrest, Tuan again appointed Chang to head the ministry of education (28 July 1925). At that time, the trouble centered about the Women's Higher Normal School in Peking, where a student strike, supported by such prominent faculty members as Chou Tso-jen, Li Shih-tseng, and Shen Yin-mo, was directed against the chancellor of that university. To end the strike, Chang decided to issue a series of drastic measures, culminating in the reorganization of the university under the ministry of education—a decision that resulted in further violence from the students and faculty. Despite the remonstrances of friends and mounting public opposition, Chang sought to enforce his measures by using the metropolitan police. Such was his unpopularity in Peking that in December 1925 his private residence was attacked and completely demolished during a student riot. Although he had submitted his resignation in November, he remained in Peking in the post of secretary general to Tuan Ch'i-jui until April 1926. After Tuan's withdrawal from the government, Chang left Peking to take up residence in the Japanese concession in Tientsin. Another source of Chang's unpopularity with young intellectuals and students was his opposition to the new literary and cultural movements, as expressed in his Chia-yin chou-k , an {The Tiger Weekly), which he had begun to publish in Peking in July 1925. In this magazine he aired his misgivings about what he called the Europeanization of China and reiterated his view that China was basically an agricultural nation which should seek to develop its existing institutions rather than try to imitate the industrialized nations of the West. While criticizing those who, he claimed, were willing to abandon China's cultural traditions in their blind desire to imitate the West, he urged a harmonizing of the old and the new—a judicious adaptation of China's distinctive traditions to the needs of the present day. These basically conservative views aroused strong objections, and even ridicule, from many progressive intellectuals of the day, to whom Chang, because of his great literary prestige and influence, seemed a dangerous reactionary.

After the establishment of the National Government in Nanking in 1928, orders were issued for the arrest of several important figures who had served in the Peking government, including Chang Shih-chao. Late in 1928, after the National Revolutionary Army had captured Peking, Chang left with his family for his third trip to Europe and spent over a year traveling through Germany, France, and England. Returning to China in the spring of 1930, he accepted an invitation from Chang Hsueh-liang, the warlord of Manchuria, to become professor of literature at Northeastern University in Mukden, and in March 1931, he became dean of the university's college of arts and letters. Through the intercession of Chang Hsueh-liang, orders for his arrest were rescinded by the National Government, and after the Mukden Incident of September 1931, he returned to Shanghai as the guest of Tu Yueh-sheng (q.v.), a powerful figure in that city. With Tu's support, he took up the practice oflaw. In October 1 932, he volunteered to serve as defense counsel for his old friend Ch'en Tu-hsiu (q.v.), the former head of the Chinese Communist party who was being tried for treason. In April 1933, Chang submitted a lengthy brief in Ch'en's defense which (though rejected by Ch'en himself) was considered a literary and legal masterpiece. Having established himself as a prominent figure in the legal world, Chang became president of Shanghai Law College in the spring of 1934.

During the early years of the war with Japan, "Chang remained in the foreign concession of Shanghai. In the autumn of 1941, however, with the help of emissaries sent by Tu Yuehsheng, he made his way to Hong Kong and thence to Chungking. He lived at Tu's residence for the rest of the war and attempted to persuade Tu to form a new political party.

Late in 1945, Chang returned to Shanghai and resumed his law practice. Among his more notable cases was his unsuccessful defense of the Japanese collaborator Liang Hung-chih (q.v.) against the charge of treason. Early in 1949, when the civil war was turning in favor of the Communists, Chang, acting as a delegate of the National Government, flew to Peiping on two occasions to discuss the possibility of peace. Chang himself was graciously received by Mao Tse-tung, to whom Chang had given some financial assistance several years previously, and whose father-in-law, Yang Ch'ang-chi, he had known while a student in England. After attempts to negotiate failed in April 1949, Chang elected to remain in Peiping. In the early 1950's he made several visits to Hong Kong, reportedly to win the support of prominent Chinese in that colony for the Chinese Communist war effort in Korea. As an elderly scholar at Peking, Chang Shihchao turned his attention to reassessment of the events and personalities of the anti-Manchu movement of the pre-1911 period. He was viewed as the leader of the group supporting the importance of Huang Hsing, rather than Sun Yat-sen, to the early history of the Chinese revolution and to the political controversies among the republican revolutionaries after the fall of the dynsasty in 1911. Chang's position was set forth in an article on Huang Hsing which he wrote for the symposium, Hsin-hai ko-ming hui-i-lu [reminiscences of the 1911 revolution], published at Peking between 1961 and 1963. There he stated that during his early days he had made friends with intellectuals and political figures all over China. Huang Hsing, because of his magnanimous nature, was the one easiest to work with. The three men who were most difficult to get along with were Chang Ping-lin, Ch'en Tu-hsiu, and Li Ken-yuan (q.v.).

The bulk of Chang Shih-chao's writings consisted of articles and essays written for various periodicals with which he was connected. Many of these were later collected and reprinted in collections such as the Chia-yin tsa-chih ts'un-kao, which included his writings for the Chia-yin tsachi, the Chia-yin jih-k'an, and the Tu-li chou-pao [independent weekly] ; and the Ch'ang-sha Changshih ts'ung-kao [miscellaneous essays of Chang of Changsha], containing his political writings in the Sin-wen-pao during 1923-24. Chang's continuing interest in logic can be seen in such volumes as his Lo-chi chih-yao [elements of logic] and his Ming-chia hsiao-shuo [short stories by noted authors]. He was also the editor of a dictionary of the Chinese language, Chung-teng kuo-wen tien [intermediate language readings], and the author of Fu-lo-i-te hsu-chuan [introductory biography of Sigmund Freud]. As a writer, Chang was considered to have been at his best in his essays in the Chia-yin tsa-chih. In these essays, markedly influenced by Western principles of grammar and logic, Chang brought to the Chinese classical language a degree of precision and clarity unsurpassed by any predecessor or contemporary.

Chang Shih-chao married Wu Jo-nan, a granddaughter of Wu Ch'ang-ch'ing, who was at one time Yuan Shih-k'ai's military superior in Korea. A student in Japan and a member of the T'ung-meng-hui, she was introduced to her future husband by Chang Ping-lin about 1906.

Biography in Chinese

章士钊
字:行严
章士钊(1881—),记者,教育家,政府官员,律师,主要由于主编《苏报》、《独立周报》,特别是《甲寅》这一类报刊而在中国文坛和政治思想界负有盛名。
章士钊,湖南长沙人,出身于一个务农家庭。他家境清寒,但他父母仍送他在本地私塾读书,由此获得了中国典籍的基础知识。1901年他和他幼弟去武昌准备入军事学堂。第二年,他进了南京陆军学堂,同学中有后来成为反满革命领袖的赵声。当时南京学生中动荡不安,他和三十几个同学一起去上海,在上海进入了爱国学社,这是一所对学生进行革命思想教育的学校,那里的教师有蔡元培(任校长)、章炳麟、吴稚晖等人。他在爱国学社认识了张继、邹容等青年激进分子。
1903年5月,章士钊主编《苏报》,除了他本人发表日益激进的观点外,又刊载了章炳麟的两篇鼓动文章,一篇是为邹容著名的《革命军》小册子写的序言,一篇是驳康有为君主立宪谬论的文章。因章士钊主编的《苏报》的革命论调日益增强,7月,满清当局查封《苏报》,并监禁章炳麟、邹容。身为该报编辑的章士钊却未遭逮捕。
1903年8月,章和张继、陈独秀等人创办了《国民日日报》,它对政治革命的主张较之《苏报》更为激烈。章士钊在该报用笔名青桐发表的文章,一时在国内的和在日本留学的学生中流行,不仅被视为是政治文献,其文章风格也被视为典范。
1903年冬,他和黄兴组织华兴会,这是湖南大举反满的一个秘密组织。他又翻译了孙逸仙政治活动的积极支持者、日本冒险家宫崎寅藏的1902年在日本第一次出现的著作《三十三年落花梦》。章士钊的节译本中有一篇序言,称赞孙逸仙是当代中国革命家。译本于1903年在上海出版,流传很广。1904年下半年,因广西前巡抚王之春被刺受嫌,与张继、黄兴一同入狱。六周后获释,他怕政府当局再来胁迫,和他的友伴去日本。
章士钊在东京对日本的近代化大有感受,他认为中国要达到同样的近代化程度,根本的要求是发展教育而并不是政治革命。因此他渐渐摒弃了他过去的激进主张。1905年8月革命的同盟会成立,虽经张继、章炳麟多次劝说,他始终拒不加入。他进了正则学校读英语,准备研究西方文化,1908年去苏格兰继续研究西方教育。他在爱丁堡大学,潜心研究政治经济学,嗜读巴奇豪特、布赖斯、霍布豪斯等有关立宪政府和内阁制度的著作。他又酷爱逻辑学而浏览了古代中国名家的著作。这样,他能校正严复有关弥尔、杰文斯的译本。
1911年10月武昌起义后,章士钊回国。他在英国时,曾写过几篇论西方立宪政府和政党发展的文章发表在北京的《帝国日报》上,引起了国内致力立宪政府的人士的注意。他到上海后,和宋教仁长时间讨论政府组织诸问题。他仍拒绝老朋友劝请他加入同盟会,但接受于右任之请参加《民立报》编辑。1912年春夏之际,他在《民立报》上概述了他对于政党政治的观点。他崇拜英国的两党政治,而对当时中国政党的混乱状态极为不满。他主张现存所有政党全行解散,然后召开全国政治协商大会成立两大政党,以便代表相反的政见。这个建议受到多方面攻击,尤其是同盟会(已改组为国民党)会员的攻击。他在国民党的猛烈攻击下,离开《民立报》,1912年9月创办了他自己的《独立周报》,继续对政府和时局发表他的理论和意见。
1912年下半年,国民党和袁世凯之间的关系紧张,袁世凯利用章和革命党的分歧,请他到北京去,并授以高职,其中包括北京大学校长之职。但章对袁世凯心存疑虑,自1913年3月宋教仁被刺后,他就离开北京去上海,在那里他遇到袁世凯的宿敌岑春煊,乃与之联合反袁。在1913年夏二次革命中,他担任老友黄兴的秘书长。二次革命失败,章和袁世凯的不少政敌一起流亡到日本,在日本住了三年。
1914年5月,他创办了他所办刊物中最有名的《甲寅杂志》,抨击袁世凯违反共和政府的原则。《甲寅杂志》一时成了国内外的重要论坛,其通讯栏尤为引人注目,来信人物中有陈独秀、李大钊、吴稚晖等人。但是主要撰稿人却是章士钊本人,他阐述立宪政府、内阁制度、政治上的协商原则等思想。他的文章论调平允,说理清楚,使《甲寅杂志》在中国知识界中获得了极大的声望,发生了极大的影响。
1916年初,武力反对袁世凯帝制运动的势力日强,章士钊和岑春煊一起回国。5月,岑春煊在广东肇庆担任反对袁世凯的军务院代理执行抚军长职,章则任秘书长。黎元洪就职当总统,旧国会恢复,章士钊以湖南议员身份(章士钊是在1913年自湖南省选出的国会议员)去北京参加国会,同时又在北京大学新设的研究所担任高级教师讲逻辑学。1917年1月他将杂志恢复改为《甲寅日刊》。6月,段祺瑞执政,解散国会,章离北京去上海。1918年5月,一年前由孙逸仙在广州成立的军政府改组,由章的旧友岑春煊主持。1919年章士钊受岑委派,任南北议和的南方代表去上海参加和议。
国内政局混乱,国会因无法对军人行使权力而一再失败,这一切使章士钊和其他知识界名人怀疑到中国是否适合采用代议政治。1921年2月,他又去欧洲亲自考察英国的政界变化。他在伦敦,和威尔斯、萧伯纳这样一些名人谈话。他们对中国政局的评论加深了他对代议政治的有效性的怀疑。他认为代议政治只适合于西方工业化国家,而中国基本上只是一个农业国,因此,其基本需要是发展适合于农业经济的社会政治机构。
章士钊1922年回国,11月由教育部聘为由北京农业专门学校改组的国立农业学院院长。1923年6月,黎元洪被直系军阀逐走,章士钊也离开北京到上海。2月,曹锟贿买国会议员当上了总统,使他从代议政治的迷梦中彻底醒悟过来。他在《新闻报》和《东方杂志》上写了不少文章,反对代议制度和其他西方输入的政治制度,而主张采取一种适应中国农业基础的政治制度。为了广泛宣传他发展中国农业的观点,他计划恢复他的《甲寅》周刊。
1924年10月,曹锟被逐,段祺瑞为临时执政。因为章士钊最近主张取消国会废除宪法,段祺瑞想利用他的声望,把他纳入政府中。11月,他就任司法总长,不久,他就着手检举贿选曹锟的国会议员。
1925年4月,因政府和北京各高等院校的冲突日益加剧,章士钊被任为代教育总长。他对各院校的学术水平和纪律表示不满,宣布教育部统管各校入学考试和毕业考试,并合并八所国立院校。他的措施引起学生们的激烈反对,在此以前,学生一直是不必考试的。对章士钊的愤怒于1925年5月7日达到高潮,这一天学生要纪念“国耻日”( 1915年5月7日,日本提出二十一条)。学生们被报纸登载的一条教育部禁止学生游行的新闻所激怒,一批人冲入章士钊住宅加以捣毁,两日后,又要求撤他的职。5月12日,章辞教育总长职去上海。
6月,章士钊受段祺瑞之请回北京仍任司法总长。面临延续不断的学潮,1925年7月26日段又任他为教育总长。当时纠纷的焦点在北京女子师范大学,学生罢课反对校长,得到该校著名教师周树人、李石曾、沈尹默等人的支持。章士钊采取强硬手段制止罢课,甚至采取由教育部强行改组该校的办法,这一决定更引起师生的反对。章士钊不顾朋友规劝和公众舆论的指责,调动京师警察谋用武力解决。章士钊如此不得人心,以至在1925年12月间,他的住宅被学生全部捣毁。他虽于11月提出辞职,但一直留在北京担任段祺瑞的秘书长之职,直到1926年4月。段祺瑞退出政府后,章士钊离北京住在天津日本租界。
章士钊在青年知识界和学生界中之所以不得人心的另一个原因,是因为他的1925年7月在北京出版的《甲寅周刊》上反对新文学和新文化运动。在这份杂志里,他说明了他对于中国的所谓欧化的疑虑,并反复申述他的所谓中国基本上是农业国家,只应发展现存的制度而不应效法西方工业化国家的观点。他批评别人盲目摹仿西方而弃本国传统于不顾。他希望新旧调和——善于采用中国特有传统,以适应目前需要。这些基本上保守的观念,引起了当时不少进步的知识界人士强烈的反对甚至嘲讽,在他们看来,由于章士钊在文学上很有声名和影响,他是一个危险的反动分子。
1928年南京国民政府成立后,曾下令逮捕北京政府中的重要人物,其中包括章士钊。1928年底,国民革命军进占北京,章士钊携全家作第三次欧洲之行,遍历德、法、英诸国一年多。1930年春回国,应东北军阀张学良之聘任东北大学文学教授,1931年3月,任该校文学院院长。经张学调解,南京国民政府取消对他的通缉令。1931年9月沈阳事变后,他应上海闻人杜月笙之请回上海,并由杜协助开业当律师。1932年10月他曾自愿为以叛国罪被捕的老友、中国共产党前首领陈独秀辩护。1933年4月章士钊提出了一篇为陈独秀辩护的长篇答辩,这篇答辩(虽未为陈独秀本人所接受)被视为文学上和法学上的杰作。章士钊在法律界成了名人后,1934年春任上海法政学院院长。
抗日作战初期,章士钊留在上海租界,1941年秋,由杜月笙派人护送经香港去重庆。战时的几年中,他蛰居在杜月笙寓所,并曾企图劝说杜月笙组织一个新政党。
1945年下半年,他回上海重开律师旧业,在他受理的许多著名诉讼案中,有一件是为汉奸梁鸿志叛国罪辩护,没有取得成功。1949年初,内战形势有利于共产党,章士钊曾当过国民政府代表去北平两次商讨和平。章士钊本人受到毛泽东优礼接待。以前章士钊曾经在经济上给予毛泽东好几年资助,章士钊早年在英国留学时也认识毛泽东岳丈杨昌济。1949年4月,谈判失败,章士钊决定留居北京。五十年代初期,他多次出访香港,据说是为了寻求当地的著名中国人士支持中国共产党的朝鲜战争。
这位住在北京的年迈学者章士钊,曾对1911年革命前反满活动中的重要事件和重要人物重新作了评价。他被认为是支持这样一种看法的一些人的代表,即认为在中国早期的革命活动中以及在辛亥革命以后革命党人中间的政治论争中,黄兴的重要作用大于孙中山。1961—1963年北京出版的《辛亥革命回忆录》的一篇他论黄兴的文章中说明了自己的意见。他说,他早年曾和全国知识界和政治界人物有过交往,黄兴为人豁达有大度,最易相处。他觉得章炳麟、陈独秀、李根源三个人最难与共事。
章士钊的大量著作包括他为一些杂志写的论文和散文,大部重刊在《甲寅杂志存稿》中,收集了载于《甲寅杂志》、《甲寅周刊》、《独立周报》上的文章;《长沙章氏丛稿》包括他在1923—24年载于《新闻报》的政论文章。他长期研究逻辑学的文章见于《逻辑指要》和《名家小说》。他还编过中文字典《中等国文典》,并写了《弗萝乙德序传》。作为一个作家来说,他在《甲寅杂志》上的文章是最好的。这些文章中,可以看出西方文法和逻辑的明显影响。章士钊运用古文辞的简练畅达,为其前人或同辈所不及。
章士钊的夫人吴弱男,是袁世凯在朝鲜时的军事上司吴长庆的孙女。她是日本留学生、同盟会会员,1906年经章炳麟介绍,认识了章士钊。

All rights reserved@ENP-China