Panchen Lama (1883-1 December 1937), earthly manifestation of the buddha Amitabha. When the thirteenth Dalai Lama (q.v.) was in exile (1904-9, 1910-12), the ninth Panchen was de facto ruler of Tibet. The Panchen was forced into exile by the Dalai in November 1923. The eighth Panchen Rimpoche [precious sage], the earthly manifestation of the buddha Amitabha, died late in 1882, and the search for his infant successor, the new incarnation of Amitabha, began immediately under the direction of high ecclesiastical dignitaries. Among the candidates was Erdeni Chuyi-Geltseng, a child born in the province ofTak-po about whom rumors of miraculous signs and gifts were circulating. A committee of high lamas investigated the child when he was three. In 1888 his name was selected from a golden urn in a traditional ceremony at Lhasa, and on 1 February 1892 he took his seat on the holy couch at Tashi Lhunpo as the ninth Panchen Lama.
The Panchen Lama's youth was devoted to studying the Buddhist doctrines traditionally expounded at the Tashi Lhunpo monastery and to mastering the administration of the monastery's extensive land holdings. The Tashi Lhunpo monastery was second only to the Dalai Lama's capital of Lhasa in territorial and political importance. The thirteenth Dalai Lama helped guide the Panchen Lama's academic and spiritual education, and in 1902 the Panchen Lama made a pilgrimage to Lhasa to take the most solemn religious vows at an ordination ceremony presided over by the Dalai Lama. This event, which occasioned several weeks of celebration throughout Tibet, marked the Panchen's coming to spiritual maturity and to full control of the secular affairs of the Tashi Lhunpo monastery. In 1903 a British expedition led by Colonel Francis Younghusband, bent on forcing Tibetan compliance with the provisions of a Sino-British treaty, made camp at Khamba, which was within the jurisdiction of the Tashi Lhunpo monastery. Although the Panchen Lama sent an emissary to demand the immediate withdrawal of the expedition from his territory, Younghusband remained. The following year, he continued his advance on Gyantse and at Geru inflicted an overwhelming defeat on the motley Tibetan troops which had been assembled to bar his passage. As a result of the Younghusband expedition's advance, the Dalai Lama fled the country, leaving the Panchen Lama as the highest ranking authority in Tibet. The years of the Dalai Lama's absence were trying ones for the Panchen Lama, for he was caught between foreign (Chinese and British) ambitions and the jealous intrigues of both the Lhasa monks and his own followers. On the recommendation of the Chinese amban [imperial resident], Yü-t'ai, the Peking government invited the Panchen Lama to act as regent during the Dalai Lama's absence. Because such an action would have violated Tibetan hierarchical practice and because the Panchen Lama stood in a student-teacher relationship to the Dalai Lama, he declined this invitation.
Soon afterwards, in September 1904, the Tibetan kashag [grand council] was obliged by the Younghusband expedition to sign a convention that, in effect, established a British protectorate. Although this agreement settled the dispute between Tibet and the British government of India, it did not lead to the immediate return of the Dalai Lama. In his continued absence, the Panchen enjoyed increased power and prestige, buoyed up by the successful settlement of the international dispute. His position rose higher still in the winter of 1905 when he visited India at British invitation to meet the Prince of Wales. The Panchen Lama and the British viewed the trip as voluntary, but the Peking government interpreted it as a bow to the dictates of foreign imperialists with designs on Tibet. Accordingly, the Peking government requested that the British minister at Peking inform the British authorities in India that the Chinese would refuse to recognize any agreement that the Panchen Lama might make in the course of his visit. The Panchen, however, was not importuned in any way by the British. He returned to Tibet early in 1906. Charles A. Bell, the British official in charge of the relations of the government of India with Sikkim, Bhutan, and Tibet, visited the Panchen in 1906 and found him eager to be independent of Lhasa and to deal with the British government as the ruler of an independent state.
Unfortunately for the Panchen Lama, he did not have sufficient room or power to maneuver in Tibet even with the Dalai Lama out of the country. The secular power of the Tashi Lhunpo monastery was limited to its own holdings. The Dalai Lama controlled even Shigatse, which was no more than a mile from the Panchen Lama's seat of power. Even though he was the incarnation of the buddha Amitabha, the Panchen wielded less ecclesiastical power than the Dalai, the incarnation of a mere bodhisattva. The Dalai Lama's line had been established before that of the Panchen Lama, and he was the earthly manifestation of Chen-re-zi, the patron deity of Tibet. In sum, the Panchen was in no position to challenge the Dalai's power. Nevertheless, there existed areas of potential disagreement between the two holy men, especially in the realm of politics. The monks of the great lamaseries traditionally were much given to jealousy and intrigue, and the respective followers of the Panchen Lama and the Dalai Lama contributed substantially, by their scheming, to the development of a rift between the two. There was no time for either deterioration or improvement of relations between them after the Dalai's return to Tibet in December 1909, for the Dalai was forced to flee Lhasa again in February 1910. The new Chinese amban, Lien-yü, asked the Panchen Lama to come to Lhasa and administer Tibet in the Dalai's absence. The Panchen went to the capital as requested, but he asked the Dalai, then in India, for instructions. At the Dalai's behest, he left Lhasa and returned to Tashi Lhunpo.
At the time of the Chinese revolution of 1911, the Dalai Lama, still in India, ordered that strong action be taken against the Chinese garrison troops occupying Lhasa. The Panchen Lama's followers and the disgruntled monks of the Ten-gye-ling lamasery in Lhasa paid little attention to these orders, and it was only through British intervention at Peking that the Chinese forces were repatriated. The Panchen courteously met the Dalai ten days' journey from Lhasa at the end of 1912 to accompany the Dalai back to his capital, but the Panchen's association with the Chinese amban and his inaction in face of virtual Chinese occupation in 1910-11 brought him sharp criticism from the Dalai. The Dalai's supporters charged that the Panchen had hoped to assume power in Tibet, citing the traditional rules which he had broken in establishing a political relationship with Lien-yü. Other incidents may have contributed to the estrangement. For one thing, the Panchen had erred in permitting his retinue to continue beating the drums when passing the Potala during the Panchen's 1902 visit to Lhasa. The Dalai fined his coreligionist 150 taels for this offense.
In 1914 the Panchen Lama sent a message to Lhasa requesting that the Dalai Lama receive him at Lhasa and give him benediction. The Dalai replied in September 1915 that the visit should be postponed because he was busy with affairs of state and because the Panchen Lama was overseeing the construction of an image of the buddha Maitreya. For various reasons, it was not until December 1919 that the Panchen finally was able to go to Lhasa and receive the Dalai's benediction. By that time, the Dalai had decided to divorce Tibet from its traditional relationship with China, to build up a modern army, and to centralize control over domestic affairs. He therefore began to apply increasing political and economic pressure on the Panchen Lama's domain, especially by attaching his revenues. In November 1923 the Dalai demanded that the Panchen pay him 5 million taels and a large quantity of grain, provide men and animals for official use, and appear in Lhasa for consultation. The Panchen responded by fleeing Tibet. Little is known about the Panchen Lama's activities in the year following his flight. Having barely escaped a cavalry force sent after him by the Dalai Lama, he apparently spent the first several months of 1924 in Outer Mongolia. About June 1924 he went to Lanchow. After sending two representatives to Peking, presumably for negotiations concerning his future, he went to Taiyuan, Shansi, arriving there early in January 1925. He received a representative of Tuan Ch'i-jui (q.v.), the chief executive at Peking, and left Shansi for Peking. On arrival at the capital, he was accorded a state welcome by the Peking government and was provided with a residence, a modest subsidy, and the title "Propagator of Sincerity and Savior of the World." He remained in Peking for over a year, departing when the Peking government came under the challenge of the Northern Expedition. Then he undertook a religious pilgrimage into Manchuria and Eastern Inner Mongolia. In 1928-30, at the invitation of various banner leaders, he held four Shih-lun chin-kang fa-hui [great Buddhist convocations].
During his religious exercises the Panchen Lama had learned by divination that "chairman Chiang [Kai-shek] can unify China and bring forth happiness and benefit for the people," and the National Government at Nanking evidently had divined that the Panchen Lama could prove very useful in connection with its aim of reestablishing Chinese control over Tibet. Accordingly, in January 1929 the Panchen Lama was made a member (in absentia) of the Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission. A month later his lieutenant Lo-sang Chien-tsan was appointed director of Tibetan affairs in the commission and director of the Nanking office of the Panchen Lama.
In February 1931 Chiang Kai-shek invited the Panchen Lama to Nanking for the nominal purpose of making inquiries regarding conditions in the borderlands. The Panchen left Liaoning by special train for Nanking, where he was warmly welcomed by high officials. He vowed adamant support for the National Government and reputedly declared that "the Three People's Principles are one with the spirit of Buddhism." The National Government responded in June 1931 by endowing the Panchen Lama with a respectable subsidy and the title of Hu-kuo hsuan-hua kuang-hui ta-shih [great teacher, protector of the country, and propagator of universal enlightenment]. A month later, in response to the joint invitation of leaders of the Mongol banners in the Hulun Buir region, the Panchen returned to Eastern Inner Mongolia to "propagate reform" (hsuan-hua) and to proclaim the National Government's "virtuous intent" (te-i). With the beginning of Japanese aggression in Manchuria in September, he left Hulun Buir and took up residence in the palace of Te Wang (Demchukdonggrub, q.v.). In April 1932 the Panchen went to Pailingmiao, Suiyuan, to prepare for his fifth Buddhist congress, held there in July 1932. On such occasions, the faithful were called upon to make rich gifts to the Tibetan religious potentate, and his visitations tended to impoverish the regions in which they took place. The form of his religious progress was fixed, however, and in October 1933 he held his sixth congress in the T'ai-tsu-tien at Peiping, with an estimated 100,000 Buddhists in attendance.
On 1 September 1932 Kung-chueh Chung-ni, the Dalai Lama's representative at Nanking, transmitted to Chiang Kai-shek a strong protest from the three leading Tibetan monasteries and the Tibetan consultative assembly demanding withdrawal of the titles and honors accorded the Panchen Lama. This action merely served to strengthen the National Government's support of the Panchen. When he visited Nanking in December 1932 he was appointed Hsi-ch'ü hsuan-hua shih [propagator of reform for the western regions]. His mission was to mollify the Mongols of Western Inner Mongolia so that they would remain loyal to Nanking. Te Wang and his supporters were pressing for autonomy with Japanese support. In January 1933 the Panchen Lama made his way to Pailingmiao for discussions with Te Wang, who then was appointed defense commissioner at P'angchiang and was given some responsibility for training Mongolian military forces. Throughout the first half of 1933 the Panchen Lama exercised a restraining influence on the ruling princes of Western Inner Mongolia, but on 14 August 1933 they sent a telegram to Nanking announcing their intention to establish an autonomous government.
The death of the Dalai Lama on 1 7 December 1933 set the stage for the Panchen Lama's final attempt to win power in Tibet. As the senior lama at Nanking, he presided over the National Government's memorial service for the Dalai, and he dispatched his deputies to various parts of China "bearing heavy gold" for holding memorial services in monasteries. Moreover, he requested the National Government to award posthumous honors to his old antagonist. In January 1934 the Panchen Lama was elected to the State Council at Nanking, and on 20 February 1934 he was sworn in. He held his seventh Buddhist congress at Hangchow in April, visited Shanghai in June, returned to Nanking, and then flew to Peiping. Before long, he moved to the Paotow area, where he resided with the Ikechao League for about two months. At the invitation of Da Wang, the ruling prince of the Alashan Special Banner, he then proceeded to Ninghsia. In February 1935 he set up office as Hsi-ch'ü hsuan-hua shih at the headquarters of Da Wang. Three months later, he flew to Sining, Tsinghai, where he established residence in the T'a-erh monastery. In due course he held his eighth Buddhist congress, again taking the occasion to proclaim the National Government's "virtuous intent." After a year's residence at Sining, he went on to the famous Labrang monastery; he held his ninth Buddhist congress at Labrang. The Panchen Lama throughout this period was moving slowly but steadily toward the borders of Tibet, and the issue of his return to Tibet assumed increasing significance in the 1930's. In probing for the conditions under which Tibet might accept the restoration of its earlier suzerain-vassal relationship with China, the National Government had asked questions bearing on the Panchen Lama and his acceptability in Tibet. The Dalai Lama had replied that it would be difficult to welcome the Panchen Lama and his followers "unless they can give a satisfactory explanation for taking flight [in 1923]." Two of the proposals carried by the National Government's 1931 mission to Lhasa were that the thirteenth Dalai Lama should welcome the Panchen Lama back to Tibet and that the secular and religious authority of the Dalai and the Panchen "should be maintained as before." Nanking's envoy, Hsieh Kuo-liang, died only one day's march from Lhasa, but the National Government proposals presumably reached Lhasa. In any event, the Panchen Lama was informed soon afterwards by a representative from Lhasa that the Dalai Lama was willing to invite him back to Tibet and to restore all his privileges. The Panchen then sent two representatives to Lhasa, but they were informed on arrival at Lhasa that the Dalai would have to consult the Tibetan assembly about the Panchen's return. At the meeting called to consider the issue, two men who were hostile to the Panchen Lama dominated the proceedings, and the assembly ruled against his return. The Panchen Lama sent the An-ch'in Hutukhtu to Lhasa for further negotiations, but the death of the thirteenth Dalai Lama put an end to this attempt. In January 1934 the National Government appointed Huang Musung (q.v.) Chinese high commissioner in Tibet. He held negotiations with the Ka-dreng Hutukhtu, who had become regent at Lhasa; the regent finally decided that the Panchen Lama would be allowed to return to Tibet if he did not bring a large Chinese escort with him and if he would not attempt to exercise any political authority at Lhasa.
On his return to Nanking in October 1934 Huang Mu-sung proposed that the Panchen Lama be provided with a military force for his return to China. In February 1935 the Panchen was assigned a military escort of some 500 troops. Huang Mu-sung became head of the Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission a month later, and plans for the Panchen's return to his homeland began to take shape. In May 1936, about the time the Panchen moved to Labrang, the National Government dispatched a special envoy, Chao Shou-yu, to accompany the Panchen on his journey. With an enormous amount of treasure, the Panchen Lama's aide Nong-yong made his way to Tachienlu in Sikang, with orders to proceed to a point of rendezvous. The time for the fulfillment of the Panchen Lama's destiny seemed to have come. In September, he left Labrang. Proceeding by way of various monasteries, he finally arrived at Jyekundo in southern Tsinghai.
The Panchen Lama's movements were of particular interest to the British and Tibetan authorities. In 1935 and 1936 the British had protested the Panchen's planned return; in 1937, as the return party stood poised at the Tibetan border, they protested again. In the meantime, the Lhasa authorities had decided to offer armed resistance to the Panchen's return, for they viewed it as a threat to Tibetan autonomy. The outbreak of the Sino-Japanese war in July 1937 overshadowed this issue, but in mid-August the Panchen and his party moved to the La-hsiu monastery on the Tsinghai- Tibetan border. On 24 August, a message reached Jyekundo from Nanking, stating that the National Government, in view of the national emergency, urged the temporary postponement of the Panchen's return to Tibet. Chao Shou-yü dispatched the message to the La-hsiu monastery, and it reached the Panchen on 28 August. Discussions and deliberations followed. In early October, during a snowstorm, the Panchen Lama and his party made their way back to Jyekundo. As a result of this journey, the Panchen developed a serious respiratory ailment. On 1 December 1937 he died.
On 24 December 1937 the National Government accorded the Panchen Lama the posthumous title Hu-kuo-hsuan-hua kuang-hui yuan-chueh ta-shih [all-perspicacious great teacher, protector of the country, and propagator of the universal enlightenment]. His spiritcoffin was kept at Jyekundo until February 1941, when officials from Lhasa finally came to accompany the Panchen Lama back to Tashi Lhunpo.
班禅喇嘛(九世)
藏名:罗桑图丹曲吉尼玛格乃朗结巴桑布
俗名:额尔德尼曲吉嘉错
班禅喇嘛(1883—1937.12.1),系转世佛祖。在第十三世达赖喇嘛于1904-09、1910-12年流放时,班禅九世成为西藏事实上的统治者,1923年11月,被达赖所迫流亡在外。
转世佛祖班禅八世登必旺修(稀世之圣)于1882年末去世,寻找他的继承人灵童的工作在高级僧侣贵族的主持下立即开始。候选的孩子中间有塔布地方的婴儿额尔徳尼曲吉嘉错,有人散布了有关他的灵异和出众才能的传说。这个孩子满三岁时由大喇嘛组成的委员会进行了鉴定。1892年他的名字在拉萨按传统仪式由金瓶掣签认定,2月1日他在札什伦布寺坐床,是为班禅九世。
班禅青年时代在札什伦布寺潜心研究佛经经管该寺大宗地产,札什伦布寺在地域和政治的重要性上仅次于达赖喇嘛的首府拉萨。达赖十三世协助指导班禅的经学和心灵教育。1902年班禅朝拜拉萨,在达赖主持的授圣职的仪式上作了庄严的宗教宣誓,这件事在全藏欢庆几个星期,标志着班禅的灵性已臻成熟,并有足够能力管理札什伦布寺的世俗事务。
1903年,英国上校荣赫鹘鹏逼令西藏实施中英协定条款,率军进占康巴宗,该地属于札什伦布寺管辖。班禅派使者要求英国远征军立即撤出他的辖区,荣赫鹏不理。次年又向江孜、骨鲁进军,大败前来拦阻的杂乱的藏兵,达赖弃国逃走,班禅成为西藏最高统治者。
达赖离藏期间,是班禅喇嘛艰难的年份,他受到外人(汉人及英人)和拉萨僧侣以及自己的追随者贪婪阴谋的夹击。当时驻藏大臣有泰奏请清廷饬令班禅在达赖出走期间以摄政身份兼管前藏政教事务,班禅因这种做法既违反西藏僧侣统治的习俗,又碍于与达赖的师弟之谊,拒不接受。
不久1904年9月,西藏噶厦被荣赫鹏强迫签订协定,西藏事实上成为英国保护国。这个协定虽然解决了西藏和印度的英国政府之间的争执,但达赖仍未返回。在达赖继续出缺期间,班禅却因成功地解决了国际争端而増加了权力和威信。l905年冬,由英政府邀班禅去印度会见威尔斯亲王后,班禅的地位更高了,班禅和英国人部把此行看成是自愿进行的,北京政府却认为这是屈从于外国帝国主义觊觎西藏的图谋。北京政府遂要求英国公使通知印度英政府,中国政府将拒绝承认班禅出访期间可能签订的任何协定。但是英方对班禅并无任何强求。他于1906年初回西裁。负责处理印度政府与锡金、不丹,西藏关系的英国官员柏尔于1906年访问班禅,发现班禅热望离开拉萨而独立并作为独立国家的统治者与英国政府打交道。
但不幸的是班禅并无足够的机会和权力来操纵西藏,即使在达赖出走期间。札什伦布寺的世俗权力只限于它自己的范围,达赖的势力甚至达到离班禅的权力宝座不到几里的日喀则地区。虽然班禅是阿弥陀佛的牝身,他却比仅仅是一个菩萨的化身的达赖掌握较少的宗教权力。达赖世系在喇嘛教中的排行在班禅之前,而且他又是西藏的神王真腊子。总之,班禅的地位是无法与达赖匹敌的,但是这两个神人之间却颇有龃龉,尤其是政治方面。各大寺庙喇嘛之间历来又多妒忌和阴谋诡计,两方随从官员又通过阴谋活动大大扩大两人之间的裂缝。1909年12月,达赖回西藏后他们之间的关系既未恶化也未改善,因为1910年2月达赖被迫再次离开拉萨。新的驻藏大臣联豫要班禅在达赖出走期间到拉萨管理西藏,班禅应命到拉萨,但他却从住在印度的达赖那里取得指示,并遵照达赖的命令离开拉萨回到札什伦布寺。
1911年中国革命发生时,达赖仍在印度,下令力阻中国军队进占拉萨,但班禅从人及一些在拉萨的大吉岭寺院的喇嘛对这些命令并不在意,只是由于英方在北京的干预,中国军队才撤回。1912年底,班禅为对经历十天路程来自拉萨的达赖表示谦恭,陪同达赖合作返回他的首府。但班禅同驻藏大臣及对1910-11年中国当局企图进占西藏表现的无能招致达赖的严厉批评。达赖的随从人员援引传统规定指控班禅破坏这些规定,和联豫建立政治关系,并企图统治西藏,其他一些偶然事件更增加了他们的不和。其中之一是班禅在1902年访问拉萨时曾错误地允许他的随从在经过布达拉宫时继续打鼓。达赖为这次犯规罚了班禅一百五十两银子。
1914年班禅向拉萨发信要求达赖在拉萨接待他并为他祝福,1915年9月达赖答以因政务繁忙,而班禅自己又正在监督須造弥陀佛像的工程,建议延期访问。由于各种原因,直至1919年12月班禅终于能够到拉萨接受达赖的祝福。当时,达赖已决定与汉族政府解除传统关系,自建近代化军队,集中管理内部事务,由此又对班禅管辖地区增加政治和经济压力,特别是向班禅増收赋税。1923年11月,达赖责令班禅缴纳五百万两银于及大批粮食、牲口支应乌拉,并去拉萨磋商,班禅乃逃离西藏。
班禅岀逃期间的活动很少为人所知。在危险地摆脱了达赖派出的一支骑兵部队的追赶以后,1924年初的几个月中,班禅显然是在外蒙古。1924年6月,班禅到了兰州,向北京政府派出代表两人。大概是为了谈判他的前途,他于1925年正月到达山西太原,北京政府执政段祺瑞派来代表,班禅遂离山西去北京。到达首都后,北京政府以国宾之礼欢迎他,提供他一个住处和可观的津贴,封给他“宣诚济世”名号。他在北京停留二年多,因北伐军即将威胁北京政府而离京。于是他去东北和内蒙东部地区作宗教朝圣活动。1928-30年,班禅应各旗头领之请,举行了四次“时轮金刚法会”。
班禅在举行佛事时声称得悉天意"蒋介石主席可以统一中国,致民生乐利"。南京国民政府显然认为可以利用班禅重建中国对西藏的统治,于是在1929年1月,任班禅为蒙藏委员会委员,一月后,其随从罗桑坚赞被任为委员会的西藏事务主管,兼班禅驻南京办事处主任。
1931年2月,蒋介石邀班禅去南京,名义上是为了询问边情。班禅乘专车离辽宁到南京,受到高级官员的热烈欢迎。班禅誓言拥护国民政府,声称“三民主义与佛敎精神一致”。1931年6月,国民政府给以可观的津贴和“护国宣化广慧大师”名号。一个月后,应呼伦贝尔都统之请,班禅回到内蒙东部地区“宣化”,并宣达国民政府的"德意”。9月.日本侵略东北,班禅离开呼伦贝尔住在德王王府中。1932年4月,他到绥远百灵庙,准备于7月举行第五次时轮金刚法会。在这些场合,信徒们要奉命向西藏的这个宗教领袖献出贵重供奉,结果常使那些地区贫穷匮乏。但是他的宗教活动业已确定,而且在1933年10月他又在北京太和殿举行第六次时轮金刚法会,参加的佛教徒估计有十万人之多。
1932年9月1日,达赖驻京代表贡觉仲尼以西藏三大寺院和西藏协商会议名义向蒋介石提交强烈抗议,要求取消班禅名号及其荣誉。这更增强了国民政府支持班禅的决心。1932年12月他访问南京吋被任命为“西陲宣化使”,其使命是宣抚内蒙西部地区,使其继续忠于南京。当时徳王由日本支持急迫要茨吕治。1933年1月,班禅去百灵庙和徳王商议,当时徳王在滂江任边防使并受命训练蒙军。1933年上半年内,班禅对蒙古西部地区王公统治者起了约束作用,但在1933年8月14日他们却打电报给南京告以他们打算建立内蒙自治政府。
1933年12月17日,达赖喇嘛死去,这是班禅获得统治西藏权力的最后良机。作为在南京的高级喇嘛,他主持了国民政府为达赖举行的追荐,他还派代表携带重金去其他地方举办追荐活动。此外他还要求国民政府给他原先的对手以死后追封。
1934年1月,班禅当选国府委员,2月20日宣誓就职,4月在杭州举行七次“时轮金刚法会”,6月访问上海,后回到南京,接着飞往北京。不久,他去包头地区,在伊克昭盟居住约两月,应阿拉善旗首领达王之请他前去宁夏,在亲王府设西陲宣化使署。三个月后,又飞往青海西宁,驻节塔尔寺,举行第八次“时轮金刚法会”,再一次利用这个机会宣达国民政府的“徳意”。在西宁居留一年后,去了著名的拉卜楞寺,举行笫九次“时轮金刚法会”。
在这期间,班禅渐渐而又坚决地向西藏边界前进。三十年代他返回西藏问题变得更为重要了。在考虑如何恢复中国同西藏的宗主间从属关系时,国民政府曾探询了班禅面临的问题及其返回西藏的可能性,达赖喇嘛答复称欢迎班禅及其追随者回藏是困难的,“除非他们能够对1923年的出走作出令人满意的解释”。
193〕年,国民政府曾两次派代表去拉萨,提出两个建仪:达赖十三世应欢迎班禅回藏,两人在藏政教权力“应维持原状”。南京使者谢国梁于到达拉萨前一日死去,但国民政府的建议看来是送到了拉萨的。不管怎样,班禅喇嘛不久得到来自拉萨的代表的通知,达赖乐于请他返回西藏并恢复其全部特权。于是班禅派出代表两人去拉萨,但他们到达拉萨后被告知,达赖必须同西藏人大会商量班禅回藏之事。在讨论此事召开的会议上,两个敌视班禅喇嘛的人操纵了会议,大会反对他回藏。班禅又派安钦呼图克图去拉萨继续商议,因达赖去世而中止。1934年1月,国民政府派黄慕松为驻西藏高级特派员。他与前藏摄政热振呼图克图商谈,摄政决定允许班禅回藏,但以不带庞大的中国护从人员,不在拉萨行使任何政治权力为条件。
1934年10月,黄慕松回南京建议武装护送班禅,1935年2月,班禅由五百人的一支部队护送。一个月后,黄慕松任蒙藏委员会委员长,班禅回藏的计划开始实现。1936年5月,班禅向拉卜楞寺前进,国民政府派赵守钰为护送专使,班禅的随从农荣携带大量财宝,启程前去西康打箭炉,奉命到达一个预定的会合地点。实现班禅命运的时机似乎等到了。9月,他到达拉卜楞。途经木少寺院,终于到达青海南部的玉树。
班禅的行动,引起英国和西藏当局的特别注视。1935和1936年英国抗议班禅返藏计划;1937年班禅一行接近西藏边境吋,又提出抗议。与此同时,拉萨当局也决定以武力阻拦班禅回藏,因为他们认为班禅的返回是对西藏自治的威胁。1937年7月,中日战争爆发,使这个问题变得暗淡了。但8月中班禅一行到达青藏边境的龙喜寺。8月24日,南京致电玉树,称国事危急,要求班禅暂缓回藏,赵守钰将此电送至龙喜寺,8月28日班禅收到此电。经商讨考虑后,班禅一行10月初在大雪中撤回玉树。由于此行的结果,班禅得了严重的呼吸道疾病,于1937年12月1日死去。
1937年12月24日,国民政府追封班禅为"护国宣化广慧园觉大师”,灵柩保存在玉村,直至1941年2月来自拉萨的官员护送班禅喇嘛灵柩返回札什伦布寺。