Biography in English

Fu Ssu-nien T. Meng-chen Fu Ssu-nien (26 March 1896-20 December 1950), was a leader in the May Fourth Movement who became a historian and an administrator of historical scholarship. He organized the Academia Sinica's institute of history and philology and served as its director for more than 20 years. He acted as director of the Academia Sinica during the Sino-Japanese war. In Taiwan, he served as chancellor of National Taiwan University.

Born into a scholarly family in Liaoch'eng, Shantung, which boasted descent from Fu I-chien (ECCP, I, 253), who was the first scholar to receive a degree of chuang-yuan or optimus in the Ch'ing dynasty and who later became a grand secretary, Fu Ssu-nien was orphaned at the age of eight. He was brought up by his paternal grandfather, a senior licentiate and sometime director of studies. Between 1905 and 1908 Fu attended primary school in Liaoch'eng, and he also was tutored in the Chinese classics by his grandfather. In 1909 he entered the Prefectural Middle School in Tientsin, from which he graduated in the winter of 1912. In the summer of 1913 Fu entered the preparatory department of Peking University. In 1916, having made a brilliant academic record, he was admitted to the department of Chinese literature. He graduated from Peking University late in 1919. In the autumn of 1917 Fu Ssu-nien, together with his roommate Ku Chieh-kang (q.v.) and Hsü Yen-chih, discussed the idea of starting a magazine to support the new thought and literary movements. With the aid of Ch'en Tu-hsiu and Li Ta-chao ('qq.v.), Fu and his friends obtained funds and a meeting place in the Peking University library. Hu Shih was their faculty adviser. On 13 October 1918 the first preparatory meeting was held. Lo Chia-lun (q.v.) suggested the title Hsin-ch'ao [new tide] and Hsti Yen-chih proposed the English subtitle "Renaissance" for the new magazine. The students, who formed the Hsin-ch'ao Society, also adopted a platform stressing critical analysis of ideas and events, scientific thinking, and revolutionary, or vernacular, language. The first issue of the magazine appeared on 1 January 1919. Before it ceased publication in March 1922, the Hsin-ch'ao had carried articles by such writers as Yü P'ing-po, Yeh Sheng-t'ao, Feng Yu-lan, Chu Tzuch'ing, and Mao Tzu-shui. In the first issue, Fu expressed agreement with Lo Chia-lun's contention that the "new tide" of the twentieth century was social revolution on the Russian model, and added that Russia would soon "annex" the world, not in territory but in thought. Fu's attitude was typical of the members of the Hsin-ch'ao Society, who tended at that time to be more radical than Ch'en Tu-hsiu, Hu Shih, or Li Ta-chao. The Hsin-ch'ao Society was not merely a literary club, but an active political group. Lo Chialun, the editor of the magazine, was one of the four student representatives who entered the American legation at Peking on 4 May 1919 to present a memorandum of grievances concerning the Paris Peace Conference decision on Shantung. Fu himself was the "marshal" of the historic demonstration. Fu Ssu-yen, Fu Ssunien's younger brother, received credit for having been the first of a band of five students to storm the mansion of Ts'ao Ju-lin (q.v.). Fu Ssu-nien published articles in the vernacular in defense of the new literature and produced poems in the new medium in imitation of Hu Shih. He was also one of the first to recognize the talents of Mao Tse-tung; he said that Mao's shortlived magazine Hsiang River Review was one of the six best publications in China. Fu's association with the Hsin-ch'ao Society ended in late 1919 when he sailed for England on a scholarship provided by the Shantung provincial government. Yü P'ing-po and Lo Chia-lun also went abroad to study, and other members of the Hsin-ch'ao Society began to drift away from Peking University. The heyday of the Hsin-ch'ao Society had been short, and the group had never numbered more than about 40 members, but most of them, like Fu, were leaders in the May Fourth Movement and subsequently played important roles in the intellectual and social development of China. Fu Ssu-nien spent almost seven years in Europe. He arrived in England in January 1920. Yü P'ing-po, who was with him, soon succumbed to homesickness and returned to China, but not before Fu had followed him to Paris and Marseilles in a vain effort to dissuade him. From 1920 to 1922 Fu studied history at the University of London and attended lectures in mathematics and experimental psychology. From September 1923 to October 1926 he studied philosophy and history at Berlin University. None of his studies led to a degree. However, Fu made the acquaintance of Yü Ta-wei (q.v.), and Yü introduced him to Yü Ta-ts'ai, whom he later married. Fu returned to China and joined the faculty of National Chungshan University in Canton in January 1927. He became head of the departments of Chinese and history, and for a time he served as acting dean of its college of arts. In the summer of 1927 Fu established a research institute for history and philology at Chungshan. During this period, Fu was active not only as an administrator but also as a scholar. His long correspondence (carried on from Europe) with Ku Chieh-kang about early Chinese history was published at this time in the weekly bulletin of the new history and philology institute.

Fu's growing reputation as a scholar and his success as an administrator led in August 1928 to his appointment as research fellow and director of the institute of history and philology in the newly established Academia Sinica, a position he was to hold for 22 years. At that time the institute had three sections: history, headed by Ch'en Yin-k'o (q.v.); philology, headed by Chao Yuen-ren (q.v.); and archeology, headed by Li Chi (q.v.). Fu Ssu-nien was fortunate in his subordinates and highly successful in coordinating their efforts as well as in procuring adequate government support for them. In October 1928 he supervised the publication of the first issue of Collected Studies in History and Philolog}' (Chi-k'an), the new institute's journal. In the first issue, Fu, in imitation of the Historische Zeitschrift (1859), defined the objective of the institute as progress in all fields of study to be achieved by research in primary sources, by enlargement of the fields of research through the discovery and investigation of new primary sources, and by the development of new research tools. In carrying out these resolves, Fu's achievements over the next two decades were impressive. Perhaps the institute's most important work during this period was the excavations at Anyang, which established the historicity of the Shang dynasty (c.1523-1028 B.C.). The institute also supervised the digging of the neolithic site at Ch'engtzu-yai in Shantung, the type site for the Black Pottery culture. The department of philology undertook a valuable series of dialect surveys, including tribal languages of the southwest, and the history department published a series of studies on sources of Ming and Ch'ing history. Fu moved the institute to Peiping in 1929 and began collecting a library which by 1937 totaled 150,000 volumes. In January 1936 Fu became de facto head of the Academia Sinica by succeeding V. K. Ting as secretary general at a time when the president, Ts'ai Yuan-p'ei, was incapacitated by illness. In 1937, to ensure the safety of the institute and its collections, notably the Central Museum, Fu supervised its evacuation to Nanking. In 1938 he organized the evacuation of the Academia Sinica to Kunming by way of Changsha and Kweilin, and he moved it to Szechwan in 1941.

In 1930 Fu became a professor of history at Peking University. He published a summary of his methods, "Shih-hsueh fang-fa t'ao-lun chiang-i kao" [provisional syllabus on historiography], in the sixth issue of Chi-k'an. As a historian, he made significant contributions to the study of the Shang and Chou dynasties and to the study of Chinese intellectual history. In 1930 he published an article, "Hsin-huo pu-tz'u hsieh-pen hou-chi pa" [notes on a newly discovered oracle-bone inscription], in which he applied epigraphic evidence to the problem of the relationship between the Shang and Chou states and to the origin of the Ch'u state. In 1932, after the Japanese occupation of Manchuria, Fu published the first volume of his projected Tung-pei shih-kang [outline of Manchurian history]. He submitted it as a memorandum to the Lytton Commission, which was investigating the Mukden Incident on behalf of the League of Nations. This hastily prepared volume was severely criticized by such historians as Miao Feng-lin, and Fu decided to give up the project. In 1937-38 he prepared for publication the Hsing-ming ku-hsun pien-cheng [studies on the ancient meanings of "nature" and "destiny"], which appeared in 1940. In the 1932-36 period he also wrote a number of current events articles for the Tu-li p'ing-lun [independent critic] and for the Tientsin Ta Kung Pao.

From 1938 to 1948 Fu was a prominent member of the People's Political Council, and he participated in political consultations between the National Government and the Communists. He visited Yenan and returned thoroughly disillusioned with the Chinese Communists. Nevertheless, he was a fearless critic of administrative defects in the Nationalist regime. In 1945 he was appointed acting chancellor of Peking University. He served in the post for three years and added colleges of engineering, agriculture, and medicine to the existing colleges of arts, science, and law. In 1946 he supervised the return of the institute of history and philology from Lichuang, Szechwan, to Nanking. In 1947, exhausted by his wartime and postwar activities and suffering from chronic high blood pressure, he went to the United States for treatment and rest. He spent almost a year in New Haven, Connecticut.

In the spring of 1948 Fu was elected in absentia to the Legislative Yuan and was appointed an academician of the Academia Sinica. After he returned to China in August, he was asked by Chu Chia-hua, the president of the Academia Sinica, to organize its evacuation to Taiwan. Because of the bulkiness of its equipment, the institute of science and engineering could not be moved, but the institute of history and philology and the mathematical research department of the institute of science and engineering was moved safely. The invaluable library of the institute of history and philology was transported to Taiwan without appreciable loss.

In January 1949 Fu became chancellor of Taiwan University. In December 1950, while reporting on conditions at the university to the Taiwan provincial assembly, he suffered an attack of high blood pressure and died. In commemoration of his services to the university, Fu's remains were interred on campus in a specially constructed Greek-style mausoleum. His collected works, Fu Meng-chen hsien-sheng chi, in six volumes, were published in Taipei in 1951, with a preface by Hu Shih.

Fu Ssu-nien married twice. His first wife, whom he married in 1911, was Ting Fu-ts'ui. They were divorced in 1934, and Fu then married Yü Ta-ts'ai.

Biography in Chinese

傅斯年 字:孟真

傅斯年(1896.3.26—1950.12.20),五四运动的领导人,后来成了历史学家和史学奖学金的支配者。他创办了中央研究院历史语言研究所,任所长二十多年。中日战争期间,任中央硏究院院长。他在台湾任台湾大学校长。

傅斯年生于山东聊城的一个书香世家,这个家族以清代第一个状元、后任大学士的傅以渐的后代而自豪。傅斯年八岁父母双亡,由祖父抚育成人。祖父是硕儒,曾任教官。傅于1905—1908年在聊城小学读书,同时又在其祖父教导下学习古籍。1909年进天津县立中学,1912年毕业。1913年进北京大学预科,1916年因成绩优良,进中文系,1919年在北大毕业。

1917年秋,他和同寝室同学顾颉刚、徐彦之等商议出版一本杂志,支持新思想和新文学运动。在陈独秀、李大钊的帮助下,他们得到了经费和在北大图书馆开会。胡适是他们的导师。1918年10月13日开第一次筹备会,罗家伦定杂志之名为《新潮》,徐彦之建议另加一英文名《文艺复兴》。参加新潮社的学生通过一项纲领,强调对概念和事物的分析批判、科学思想和革命的语言——即白话的讨论。1919年元旦该杂志创刊号出版。直到1922年8月停刊以前的期间
内,俞平伯、叶圣陶、冯友兰、朱自清、毛子水都写过文章。在第一期中,傅斯年撰文同意罗家伦的意见,认为二十世纪的“新潮”是俄国式的社会革命,他还认为不久俄国将“吞并”全球,不是在领土上,而是在思想上。傅斯年的
看法是新潮社社员的典型代表,他当时比陈独秀、胡适、李大钊更为激进。因此新潮社不仅是一个文学俱乐部,而且是一个活跃的政治团体了。罗家伦是五四运动时到美国使馆递送抗议巴黎和会对于山东问题决定的备忘录的四名学生
代表之一,傅斯年则是这个有历史意义的示威运动的“统帅”。他的兄弟傅斯炎是首先打进曹汝霖住宅的五名学生之一,以此而为人称道。傅斯年用白话文写文章捍卫新文学运动,并且仿效胡适写新体诗。他是最早发现毛泽东才华的一
人,认为《湘江评论》是全国最好的六种杂志之一。傅斯年和“新潮”的关系于1919年终结,那时,他以山东省公费去英国留学,俞平伯、罗家伦也出国留学了。新潮社中的其他人物也离开了北大。新潮社的全盛期为时不长,它的社
员也从未超过四十人。但是其中不少人,例如傅斯年就是其中之一,他们对五四运动以及在后来中国的思想和社会发展中起了重要作用。

傅斯年在欧洲七年,他于1920年1月到英国。俞平伯不久因思乡而回国,傅曾追到巴黎和马赛去劝阻,但未成功。1920一1922年,傅斯年在伦敦大学研究历史,还听数学和实验心理学的课程。1923年9月到1926年10月,傅斯年
在柏林大学学哲学和历史,他所学各科均未获得学位。他认识了俞大维,俞将俞大彩介绍给他,后来他们结为夫妇。

傅斯年回国后,1927年在广州中山大学教书,任中文及历史系主任,后又一度代理文学院院长。1927年夏,他在中山大学里设立了历史语言研究所。这一期间,傅斯年不但是一名教育行政工作者,而且也是一名非常活跃的学者。
他在欧洲时就开始和顾颉刚长期通信讨论中国古史,在历史语言研究所的周刊上发表。

傅斯年在学术上的声望和教育工作上的成就使他在1928年担任了中央研究院历史语言硏究所研究员兼所长,他担任此职达二十二年之久。那时,该研究所分为三部:历史由陈寅恪负责;语言由赵元任负责:考古由李济负责。傅斯年
有幸拥有这样三位助手,而且在协调他们的工作和取得政府的充分支持上做得极为成功。1928年10月,他主持了该所新出学报《历史语言所集刊》第一期的出版。在这一期中,傅斯年仿效德国的《历史年报》(1859年创刊)阐明硏究所
的目的是通过对原始资料的调査、通过发现与调查新原始资料以扩大调査范围和通过发展新调査工具来取得研究方面的进歩。傅斯年为了达到这个目的,在此后二十年的工作中成绩是很显著的。研究所这一时期最主要的工作可能
是安阳的发掘,从而建立了商代(C.1523—1028B.C.)的信史。该所又在山东城子崖发掘新石器时代遗址,黑陶文化代表所在地。语言学部对各地方言,包括西南少数民族的方言,进行了系列的宝贵调査。历史学部出版了一
套明清史料的研究。1929年,傅斯年把历史语言研究所迁到北平,建立图书馆,到1937年止收藏书籍达十五万册之多。1936年1月,傅斯年代丁文江任中央研究院秘书长,在院长蔡元培患病期间,他实际上成了中央硏究院的实际负
责人。1937年,为了保障研究所的收藏品,特别是中央博物院的安全,傅主持将其迁往南京。1938年他组织中央研究院的撤退,经长沙及桂林迁往昆明。1941年他又将该院迁往四川。

1930年傅斯年任北京大学历史教授时,他有关史学方法的文章《史学发凡讨论讲义稿》在集刊第六期上发表。他对殷周历史和中国文化史的研究很有贡献。1930年他发表了《新获卜辞写本后记跋》以实物考证殷、周各国之间的关
系及楚国的起源。1932年,日军占领东北后,他出版了《东北史纲》第一卷,作为提交国联满洲问题李顿调査团的备忘录。这一仓促写出的著作受到史学家缪凤林等人的严厉批评,因此傅斯年就此置笔。1937—1938年,他准备发表《性
命古训辨正》,1940年出版。1932—1936年,他为《独立评论》,及天津《大公报》写过不少时论文章。

1938—1948年,傅斯年是国民参政会中的重要人物。他参预了国共协商。他访问延安归来后,对共产党的幻想彻底破灭。但是,对国民党政权的弊政也敢于直言批评。1945年,他代理北大校长。在他的任职三年期间,他在原有的
文、理、法学院之外又增设了工学院、农学院、医学院。1946年,他又主持把历史语言研究所从四川李庄迁回南京。1947年,他由于战时和战后的活动过于劳累,又患有慢性高血压症,去美国休养治疗,在纽黑文住了一年。

1948年,傅斯年缺席被选为立法委员,并授以中央研究院院士称号。八月回国后,他应中央研究院院长朱家骅之请,组织该院迁往台湾。由于理工研究所的设备过重,无法迁移,而历史语官研究所和数学研究所则安全迁走了。历
史语言研究所的大批珍贵资料运往台湾未遭重大损失。

1949年1月,傅斯年任台湾大学校长。T950年12月,当他正向台湾省鑫政会汇报台湾大学的工作时,高血压病突然发作而死去。为了纪念他对台湾大学的贡献,傅斯年的遗体葬在台湾大学校园内特建的一座希腊式陵墓中,他的文
集六卷《傅孟真先生集»,1951年在台北出版,由胡适作序。

傅斯年两次结婚,他1911年结婚的前妻是丁福翠,于1934年离婚,然后与俞大彩结婚。

All rights reserved@ENP-China