Liao Ping

Name in Chinese
廖平
Name in Wade-Giles
Liao P'ing
Related People

Biography in English

Liao P'ing (29 March 1852-6 June 1932), educator and controversial scholar of the Kungyang school of classical interpretation, which supported the chin-wen [new text] versions of the Chinese classics. His writings influenced such scholars as K'ang Yu-wei and Ku Chiehkang.

Chingyen, Szechwan, was the birthplace of Liao P'ing. His father tended cattle and later owned a small mill, but the family's financial situation remained such that all four children had to go to work. Because he was determined to acquire a classical education, Liao P'ing left home and went to live in a Buddhist monastery. He attended a local school and later went to Chengtu and studied under Wang K'ai-yün (q.v.) at the Tsun-ching Academy, where he was considered to be a brilliant student. He became a chü-jen in 1879 and a chin-shih in 1881. He refused an appointment as a magistrate because he wished to be near his ailing parents.

After returning to Szechwan, he taught at a number of provincial schools before settling in Chengtu, where he headed the Academy of Chinese Studies (Kuo-hsuehyuan) and taught at Chengtu Higher Normal College and West China Union University. Liao, who was a scholar of the Kung-yang school of classical interpretation, believed that the officially recognized ku-wen [old text] versions of the Chinese classics were inferior to the chin-wen [new text] versions of the Former Han dynasty. He upheld the authenticity of the Kung-yang and the Ku-liang commentaries and denounced the Tso-chuan as a forgery of the Han dynasty scholar Liu Hsin.

In 1886 his Chin ku hsueh k'ao [on the new text and the old text learning] was published, and it apparently came to the attention of K'ang Yuwei (q.v.). This work later was revised and published as two books, P'i Liu p'ien [treatise rejecting Liu Hsin] and Chih-sheng p' ien [treatise on knowing the sage]. In the second book, Liao argued that the authentic chin-wen texts revealed Confucius as an advocate of institutional change. After meeting Liao in 1890, K'ang Yu-wei published the Hsin-hsueh wei-ching k'ao [the forged classics of the Wang Mang period], in which he claimed to have discovered the forgeries of Liu Hsin. K'ang's book enhanced his scholarly reputation and provoked a storm of controversy which resulted in the banning of the Hsin-hsueh wei-ching k'ao in 1894. In 1897 he published the K'ung-tzu kai-chih k'ao [Confucius as a reformer], w'hich also adopted and developed Liao P'ing's ideas. Although Liao P'ing was distressed by K'ang's borrowings, he took no action against him.

According to Liao P'ing, his scholarly viewpoint passed through six stages. Accordingly, he called his studio the Liu-i-kuan [hall of six stages]. Even his close associates, however, had difficulty in understanding these changes. In general terms, he seems to have begun by accepting the theories of traditional scholars of the Latter Han dynasty, who made no attempt to challenge the Wang-chih [royal polity] or the Chou-li [rituals of Chou]. As evidenced by his Ku-hsueh k'ao of 1896, he came to regard the Chou-li as a fabrication of Liu Hsin. Later, in the Wang-chih chi-shuo [explanation of the Wangchih] and Huang-ti chiang-yü t'u-piao [the imperial domain, with charts], he concluded that the Wang-chih and the Chou-li had been utilized by the earliest emperors of China both to govern China and to provide guidance for the control of all nations on earth.

Finally, while reversing his earlier stand by acknowledging Confucius as the author of the classics, he nevertheless classified the Li-chi [book of rituals], the Ch'un-ch'iu [spring and autumn annals], and the Shang-shu [book of documents] as Jen-hsueh [humanistic studies] and the Shih-ching [book of songs], the I-ching [book of changes], and the Yueh-ching [book of music] as T'ien-hsueh [super-humanistic studies]. This classification aroused considerable controversy in the field of classical studies.

In addition to his classical studies, Liao P'ing wrote a number of books on geomancy and medicine. His works on the classics prior to 1897 were published in 14 volumes under the collective title Ssu-i-kuan ching-hsueh ts'ung-shu. In 1921 the Hsin-ting Liu-i-kuan ts'ung-shu, a greatly enlarged version of the earlier collection which also included a number of medical articles, was published at Chengtu. Liao P'ing retired from teaching in 1924. He died on 6 June 1932 at his home near Chiating, Szechwan.

Biography in Chinese

廖平

原名:廖登廷

字,学斋、季平

号:煦陔、四益

廖平(1853.3.29—1932.6.6),教育家,有争议的名公羊学今文派学者,他的著作对康有为、顾颉刚等学者颇有影响。

廖平的出生地是四川井研,他父亲先是饲养牲畜,后来有了一所磨坊,但家境仍是清贫,四个孩子不得不外出谋生。廖平立意习读中园典籍,遂离家到一所寺庙去,后再本乡就学,又去成都在崇精书院从王闿运就学,成绩优异。1879年中举人,1881年中进士,他因不愿远离患病的父母,未去就县知事职。回四川后在一些省立学校教书,以后在成都定居,主持国学院,并在成都高等师范、华西联合大学教书。

廖平是今文学家,他认为官方认可的古文经远较前汉的今文经为差,他以公羊、榖梁传为真传,而以左传为汉刘歆所伪造。1886年,廖平的《今古学考》出版,即为康有为所重视,此书后分为《批刘篇》、《知圣篇》二书,在后一本书中廖平声称真实的今文经典籍,说明孔子是主张改命制度的。1890年,康有为与廖平会见后。出版了《新学伪经考》,声称他已经发现了刘歆的伪作。此书使他立即在学术界取得盛名,并引起一场热烈争论,结果导致该书于1894
年被查禁。1897年,康有为又出版了《孔子改制考》,此书采用并阐发了廖平的观点,廖对康有为的抄袭虽感不快,但在行动上没有作出反对的表示。

廖平自称他的学术观点经历过六个阶段,因比把自己的书斋称作以“六释馆”,事实上,连他的亲密朋友也难以弄清楚这些变化。一般说来,他在开始时似乎接受东汉学者的传统观点,他们并不怀疑《王制》、《周礼》。他于1896年所作的《古学考》却以《周礼》为刘歆所伪造,后来,在《王制集说》
《皇帝疆域图表》中他认为《王制》《周礼》是中国古代皇帝用以统驭国内的作为控制全球听有国家的指针,最后他修改了自己过去的立场,承认孔子是古代经典的作者,然而,他却把《礼记》、《春秋》、《尚书》作为仁学,把《诗经》、《易经》、《乐经》为天学。这种分类法引起研究古代典藉的学术界的极大争论。

廖平除研究儒家经书外,还写了一些关于风水及医学方面的文章。他在1897年前写有关古代经典的文章,编集在《四益馆经学丛书》中,计十四册,1921年又在成都出版了篇幅大为増加的《新订六释馆丛书》,其中也收集了他的医学著作。

1924年,廖平退休不再教书,1932年6月6日死在四川嘉定附近的家乡。

All rights reserved@ENP-China