Biography in English

Fei Hsiao-t'ung (2 November 1910-), social anthropologist, became known in CKina as a pioneer in field research. He applied Western anthropological theories and methods to Chinese data.

Wuchiang, Kiangsu, was the birthplace of Fei Hsiao-t'ung. His family belonged to the local gentry, but was not wealthy. He had two brothers, Fei Ch'ing and Fei Chen-tung. Little is known about his childhood except that he attended a girls school for several years. Fei attended Yenching University, where he studied under University of Chicago sociologist Robert E. Park. At this time, Chinese data for sociological research were almost nonexistent because so few field studies had been conducted. Visiting professors in China (such as Robert Park and R. H. Tawney, the author of Land and Labor in China) deplored this lack and encouraged Fei and other students to conduct field studies. Fei was among the Yenching students who began their field studies under the leadership of Wu Wen-tsao {see under Hsieh Wan-ying) .

After being graduated in 1933, he studied at Tsinghua under S. M. Shirokogoroff, a Manchu specialist. In 1935-36 Fei and his wife, Wang Tung-wei, studied the Yao minority in Kwangsi. On the field trip, Fei fell into a tiger trap, and his wife drowned in a river when trying to get help. The results of their research were published by the Commerical Press in 1936 as Hua-lan-yao she-hui tsu-chih — Kuang-hsi-sheng hsiang-hsien tung-nan hsiang [the social organization of the Hua-lan-yao, an aboriginal tribe in Kwangsi] .

Late in 1936 Fei went to England. He studied under Bronislaw Malinowski at the London School of Economics and received a Ph.D in social anthropology. His thesis was entitled "K'ai-hsien-kung: Economic Life in a Chinese Village." From Malinowski and A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, Fei learned to focus on the functional interrelationships of various "parts" of a community and on the meaning of a culture as seen by its own members. He devised survey methods which incorporated the functional approach and discovered that these new methods elicited far more meaningful responses than the social survey methods used by J. L. Buck and other investigators of rural conditions in China. Fei's methods were demonstrated by his book Peasant Life in China (1939). After returning to China, Fei became a professor of social anthropology at National Yunnan University, a research fellow of the Sino-British Foundation (1939-41), and the director of the Yenching-Yunnan Station for Sociological Research. Between 1939 and 1943 Fei and his colleagues at the research station made studies of selected communities in the Kunming hinterland. In 1943 Fei was invited to visit the United States by the Department of State. He lectured and did research at Harv-ard University, the University of Chicago, and the Institute of Pacific Relations in New York. At the 1944 Harris Foundation Conference, held at the University of Chicago, he read a paper describing his Yunnan field work. His Earthbound China (1945), written with Chang Chih-i, compared three of the hinterland communities, representing three degrees of concentration of land ownership and tenancy. Fei recommended the introduction of rural cooperative industry, with land ownership of small units, but with land management of considerably larger units. During this period, Fei translated Bronislaw Malinowski's Theory of Culture and Raymond W. Firth's Human Types. Both were published in 1944. In an essay, "Peasantry and Gentry," published in the American Journal of Sociology in July 1946, Fei characterized China as a twoclass society, with a large peasantry and a small gentry differentiated from each other by kinship patterns, residence, economic and political roles, attitudes, and values. He showed that the opposition between peasantry and gentry in traditional China had been kept within bounds by economic interdependence, relatively high social mobility, political cooperation in the face of imperial demands, and a common social ethic. In the 1940's Fei came into conflict with the National Government and the Kuomintang. After the assassination of Wen I-to (q.v.) in July 1946, Fei took refuge in the American consulate at Kunming. Later that year, Fei, who had become professor of anthropology at Tsinghua University, visited England under the auspices of the British Council. He arrived in England in November 1946 and remained there for three months. He spent most of his time at the London School of Economics, but also visited Oxford and spent a brief period in the Oxfordshire village of Kirklington studying aspects of rural life.

After returning to China in 1947, Fei taught at Tsinghua. His Sheng-yü chih-tu [systems of child rearing] was published in 1947. It analyzed the institution of child-raising, with particular reference to the Chinese family system. In Hsiang-Vu Chung-kuo [rural China], Fei contrasted traditional China, viewed as a rural type of society, and modern society. This book also summarized Fei's views on the village. In 1948 Fei published Alei-kuo-jen hsing-ko [first visit to America], Hsiang-Vu ch" ung-chien [rural reconstruction], and Shen-ch' üan yü huangch^üan [gentry power and imperial power]. During this period, Fei also wrote newspaper articles criticizing aspects of traditional Chinese society and, indirectly, the political and social policies of the Kuomintang. At Tsinghua, he came to know Professor Robert Redfield, a University of Chicago anthropologist, and his wife, Margaret Park Redfield. Because Fei hoped to acquaint Western readers with the ideas he had expressed in newspaper articles, in the autumn of 1948 he dictated rough translations of his articles to Mrs. Redfield. After returning to the United States, she revised and edited the translations and supplemented them with six life-histories of Chinese gentry collected by Yung-teh Chow in Yunnan between 1943 and 1946. The resulting book, published at Chicago in 1953 with an introduction by Professor Redfield, was entitled China s Gentry. Immediately after the Communist occupation of north China, Fei was appointed to the university affairs committee which temporarily managed Tsinghua University. From November 1949 until 1954 he was a member of the culture and education committee of the Government Administration Council. Beginning in 1949 he was also a member of the executive committee of the Sino-Soviet Friendship Association, becoming a member of its second executive board in 1954. His other offices included: deputy director of the culture and education department of the central committee of the China Democratic League; member representing the China Democratic League in the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference; and member of the executive committee of the Chinese People's Institute of Foreign Affairs.

In 1950, as deputy leader of a good-will mission to the national minority groups, Fei went to southwest China to study several remote communities. In 1951 he became a member of the council of the China Political Science and Law Association; in June, he was made vice president of the Central Institute for Nationalities in Peking. From 1953 to 1954 he was a member of the culture aijd education committee of the Peking Municipal People's Government. He attended the First National People's Congress in August and September 1954 as a deputy representing Kiangsu province and as a member of the Nationalities Affairs Commission. In July 1955 Fei became a member of the executive board of the third session of the Chinese People's Institute of Foreign Affairs. He was elected to the central committee of the China Democratic League in February 1956. In October, he became chief of the specialists bureau of the State Council.

In 1950 Fei had written a number of articles praising the "new democracy." In Wo che i-nien [this year of my life] he said that 1949 had been his year for hsueh-hsi, that is, intensive study of Chinese Communist doctrine. He criticized his fellow intellectuals for stinting in their efforts at thought reform and confessed the difficulties that he had encountered in attempting to reach the heights of proletarian consciousness. The same year, at a meeting at Tsinghua University, Fei had joined such professors as Chang Tung-sun, Tseng Chao-lun, Ch'ien Weich'ang, and Ch'ien Tuan-sheng in expressing disapproval of government plans to reorganize Chinese higher education along Soviet lines. Fei and many other scholars hoped that Chou En-lai's January 1956 speech on a new education policy might mean "re-liberation." During the so-called Hundred Flowers period, Fei said in an article published in the Jen-min jih-pao that although the new policies of socialist construction had brought economic improvement in China, they had not freed scholars to pursue research without fear or restraint. Intellectuals, he said, faced the uncertain weather of early spring, not knowing from day to day what to expect. He made a plea for "one room and two books" and freedom for uninterrupted study. As a result of this article and other public pronouncements of the same nature, Fei was severely criticized later in 1957 in the antirightist campaign. He was charged with being the leader of the so-called rightist intellectual faction of a group which allegedly was headed by Chang Po-chün and Lo Lung-chi (qq.v.). He also was accused of such intellectual heresies as supporting the so-called idealist sociology of Liang Shu-ming (q.v.) and favoring the' revival of capitalism. Fei confessed that his earlier statements reflected "an inaccurate estimate of the intellectuals" and declared that he intended to fight the rightists. The designation of Fei as a rightist was rescinded on 16 September 1959. On 11 April, he had been appointed to the Third Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference as a delegate from the China Democratic League.

In Fei's works of the 1950's, such as IVo che i-nien, he retracted his earlier lack of confidence in the Chinese people's potentialities for overcoming such obstacles as low income and capital accumulation, poor technology, and over-population. Under Communist leadership, he said, China could become a modern, industrialized country. His Min-chu hsien-fa jench'üan [the people's rights under a democratic constitution] was intended for the average reader who wished to grasp the "correct" meaning of constitutionalism, democracy, and civil rights. Fei's analysis of the Yi people in Liangshan, Kweichow, appeared in his Hsiungti min-tsu tsai Kuei-chou [a brother nationality in Kweichow] .

Fei remarried in 1942 and had one daughter by his second wife.

Biography in Chinese

费孝通

费孝通(1910.11.2—),社会人类学家,他在国内开创实地调查因而闻名,他把西方的人类学家理论和方法应用于中国的资料。

费孝通生在江苏吴江,出身于仕绅家庭,但并不富裕。他还有两个兄弟费青和费振东。他童年的情况不详,仅知道他曾在一个女子学校读过几年书。

费孝通进燕京大学后,在芝加哥大学社会学家派克门下从事研究。当时,实地调査极少,社会学研究方面的中国资料几乎一点也没有。来华的客座教授(如派克及《中国的劳工和工地》的作者泰纳)深以为憾,鼓励费孝通等人从事
实地考察研究。费孝通就在吴文藻的领导下进行这项工作。1933年,他燕京毕业后,在清华大学跟随一名满族问题专家史禄国夫学习。1935—1936年,费孝通和他的妻子王桐维去广西研究瑶族。在野外考察中,费陷入虎阱,他妻子因设法拯救而落水淹死。他们的这一次研究成果《花篮瑶社会组织》一书,1936年由商务印书馆出版。

1936年底,费孝通去英国,跟随伦敦经济学院的马林诺斯基研究,获得社会人类学博士学位。他的论文题目是《中国乡村的经济生活》,费孝通就马林诺斯基和雷德克利夫一布朗那里学会的如何在一个社会的各个“部分”的关键
性相互关系,和该社会成员对一种文化的看法上着眼,他体现了关键门路的调查方法,并发现这些方法带来比卜凯和其他调査中国农村情况的人使用的方法所得结果有大得多的意义。费孝通运用的方法表现于他的《中国农民的
生活》(1939)_书中。

费孝通回国后,任国立云南大学社会人类学教授,中英文化基金会研究员(1939—1941),燕京大学云南社会学研究站主任。1939—1941年间,费孝通和该站研究人员选定了昆明周围一些偏远地区的社会作了研究。1943年,他应
美国国务院之请去美国,在哈佛大学、芝加哥大学和纽约太平洋关系研究常讲学和研究。1944年,他在芝加哥大学主办的哈利斯基金会议上宣读了一篇他与张志宜合写的有关云南的实地调查报告,《与土地分不开的中国》,比较了三这偏远地区中土地所有和租佃的集中程度。他推荐以土地所有权小但土地使用权大的方法举办农村合作工业。

这一期间,费孝通还翻译了马林诺斯基的《文化的理论》、费兹的《人类的种型》等书,均在1944年出版。1946年7月,费孝通在《美国社会学杂志》上发表了一篇《农民和士绅》,他认为中国是一种两个阶级的社会,以世族、
住地、经济政治上的作用、观点和重要性,区分为多数的农民和少数的士绅。他指岀,在中国历史上,农民与士绅相互依赖,在皇帝统治之下的政治合作,和共同的社会道德观念的限度内保持其独立。

四十年代中,费孝通和国民政府和国民党发生了冲突。1946年7月闻一多被暗杀时,他在昆明美国领事馆内避难。这一年,他任清华大学人类学教授,在中英文化基金会的安排下去英国。他于1946年11月到英国,呆了有三个月。
他的大部分时间都在伦敦经济学院,但也访问过牛津大学,在牛津郡的柯克林顿村小住,研究乡村生活情况。

1947年回国后,费仍在清华任教。1947年发表了一篇《生育制度》,分析了养儿育女习惯和中国家庭制度之间的关系。他在《乡土中国》一书中,把过去的中国视为一种农村型的社会,和现代社会作了比较。这本书概括了费孝通对乡村的观点。1948年发表了《美国人性格》、《乡士重建沢《绅权与皇权》。

这一期间,费孝通还在报纸上写了一些文章,批评过去中国,暗指国民党的政治社会政策。他在清华大学认识了芝加哥大学人类学教授雷德菲尔德夫妇,他希望西方读者能理解他在报纸上发表的那些文章的观点,向雷德菲尔德的妻子
口述了大意。她回美国后,重加校订整理,又增加了1943—1946年在云南永德州收集的大批中国乡绅的传记。此书由雷德菲尔德作序,以《中国乡绅》为名,1953年在芝加哥出版。

共产党解放华北后,费孝通参加了暂时管理清华大学的校务委员会。1949年11月至1954年他是政务院所属文教委员会的委员。从1949年开始,他还任中苏友好协会执行委员,1954年又任该会的执行理事。他所担任过的各种职务
有:民盟中央委员会文教部副部长、政治协商会议的民盟代表,人民外交学会执行委员。

1950年,他任少数民族慰问团副团长,去西南地区调查一些边远的社会。1951年任中国政法协会委员,6月任北京中央民族学院副院长。1953—1954年任北京市文教委员,1954年8、9月,作为江苏代表及民族事务委员会委员出
席第一届全国人民代表大会。1955年7月,任人民外交学会三届执行委员,1956年2月,被选为民盟中央委员。10月,任国务院专家局局长。

1950年间,费孝通写了不少文章赞扬“新民主主义”。《我这一年》这篇文章中,他说1949年是他的“学习”年,深入研究中国共产党的理论。他批评有些知识分子思想改造的局限,承认他自己在试图攀登无产阶级觉悟高峰遇到的困难。同年,他在清华和另一些教授,如张东荪、曾昭抡、钱伟长、钱端升等不同意政府沿用苏联路线实行教育改革。

1956年1月,周恩来总理作了一次关于新的教育制度的报告,费孝通和许多其他学者认为这是一次“再解放”
。在“百花齐放”时期,费孝通在《人民日报》上发表了一篇文章,说社会主义建设的新政策给中国带来了经济发展,
但是未能使学者们无顾忌或自由从事研究工作。他说,知识分子正面临着早春期间变化不定的气候,每天都不知道会有什么事情发生。他要求“一间书室两本书”,不受干扰进行研究的自由。由于这篇文章及其它同样性质的公开言论,
1957年在反右斗争中,费孝通受到严厉的批判。他被认为是一个以章伯钧、罗隆基为首的右派知识分子的头面人物。他又被指责支持所谓梁漱溟的唯心主义社会学派的谬论,赞同复辟资本主义。费孝通承认,他早期的一些言论反映了
“对知识分子的错误估计”,并声明要对右派分子作斗争。1959年9月16日,摘掉了右派帽子。4月11日,以民盟代表任第三届全国政治协商会议委员。

费孝通在五十年代的《我这一年》一类著作中,收回了他以前对克服中国人民对收入和资金积累太少、技术力最不足、人口过多等困难的潜力信心不足的意见。他认为在共产党领导下,中国可以成为一个近代化、工业化的国家。他
的《民主宪法人权》一文是为了想“正确”理解宪法、民主和人权意义的一般群众而写的。费孝通关于凉山彝族的研究,写在《兄弟民族在贵州》一书中。

费孝通于1942年再次结婚,有女儿一人。

All rights reserved@ENP-China